SOURCE :- THE AGE NEWS
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have chosen not to speak out against the many who appear to feel forced to comment on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s catastrophic imprisonment and time in police custody.
Why? Prince Harry is aware that for once, nothing may come of pitching in to the shame of his family because of all of his smoldering rage and frustration over being “lumped along” with his errant uncle.
In his autobiography, Spare, the king made his sights on Andrew all very abundantly clear.
He claimed it was amazing to him that Andrew, who had been accused of sexual assaulting a girl, didn’t face such consequences while he and Meghan were being stripped of their taxpayer-funded surveillance for choosing to live abroad.
No one had even suggested that he gain his safety because no one had been accused of sexual assaulting a young girl, and no one had even said that.
Sexual offences weren’t included on the roster, despite any grievances people may have had against us.
These two brief passages accomplish a lot of big pulling. Deep down, those terrible rivers.
Despite year after year of sordid revelations and complaints regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, Harry has long struggled to understand how Buckingham Palace” circled the trucks” on Andrew.
Harry, in contrast, thinks that he was unceremoniously thrown free before being torn to pieces for airing the mother’s filthy cleaning in a slew of unusual television interviews.
The tendency to refer to Harry and Andrew as” the Dukes of Hazard” has merely increased tension since then.
The Duke of Sussex had distinguishedly served his country for ten times. His biggest crimes included a couple intoxicated nights out and a poorly dressed fancy dress outfit. But why, then, did the family react so quickly to stop him from receiving any money or safety while Andrew remained institutionalized for years?
Harry and his brother William both had fond memories of their uncle, but it is no secret that Harry never liked them many. He also had fond memories of his cousins Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie.
However, he strongly refuted a statement that he had allegedly given the past Duke of York” a terrible head” in 2013 during a fight at a family gathering.
In Entitled, historian Andrew Lownie claims that Andrew once told his brother that his marriage to Meghan do” never last more than a month.”
He allegedly accused Meghan of being an egotist and said she was very aged for Harry, adding that his brother was committing the biggest error of his life.
Before making the proposal in 2017, Andrew is said to have told his brother that he had gone “bonkers” and that he had never done “any due devotion into her history.”
The Sussexes ‘ official responded to the claims made last year with a properly worded answer saying that” Andrew never had a physical combat, nor did he ever render the remarks he is alleged to have made about the Duchess of Sussex to Prince Harry.”
Whatever has already happened, the Sussexes are unconvinced as to the seriousness of Andrew’s imprisonment and what it means for the monarchy’s status.
Harry has much criticized inequity. His decision to pursue legitimate proceedings against the news media served as an example of his personal wish for accountability.
So, his ideas speak for themselves.
In Britain, there is little like lost for Harry and Meghan. However, regardless of where one is on the border, it will undoubtedly be gratifying to finally realize there are times when it is preferable to just say nothing.
London’s The Telegraph
Receive a statement about what is making headlines all over the world from our foreign reporters right away. Sign up for our What in the World email each week.
