Source : THE AGE NEWS
Energy analysts who predict a conflict involving Iran have long been concerned about two developments, including the Islamic Republic’s repression of its oil-rich neighbors and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world’s crude and a fifth of liquefied natural gas ( LNG ) transit daily.
Until February 28, both risks seemed distant because Iran had too much to gain. It may run the risk of incendiating China, the country’s principal oil buyer, and provoking strikes on its own gas infrastructure. It would also risk pushing Gulf states toward America, its sworn foe.
What little of the mullahs ‘ government remains after America and Israel killed its high chief on February 28? And both elements of the horror scenario are happening at once.
Iranian missiles have hit Saudi Arabia’s largest refinery, a gas-liquefaction complex in Qatar, another refinery in Kuwait and the Fujairah oil industry zone in the United Arab Emirates ( UAE), a major transit and bunkering hub. Gas grounds in Israel and Kurdistan are both online, as are the first two. The Saudi Arabian government’s official in Saudi Arabia issued a warning about an immediate Egyptian attack on Dhahran, the country’s massive oil complex, on March 3.
On March 3, Donald Trump sought to cool things down, saying that America would provide coverage and offers for shipping outlines, and that, if necessary, the army would escort oil ships in the Gulf, though the details of the strategy remain unclear. The news comes as traders have grown increasingly skeptical about the problems to the supply of energy.
The American-Israeli battle started on a weekend when the markets closed. When they reopened in the Eastern day on March 2nd, the first response was contained. The day’s closing price was$ 78, which is only$ 5 above the previous close of the war. Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin invaded Ukraine, Western oil increased but eventually sank to €44 per MWh, which is far below its top of over €310 in 2022. Most investors expected disruptions to past days, not days.
They are currently making quick revisions to that opinion. Using fuel, first. The main concern is impeded customers through the Gulf. Shipping costs are at new information. According to Vortexa, a ship-tracker, just four fuel tankers crossed the Strait of Hormuz on March 2, up from 52 on a daily normal in February. Some 14 million barrels per day ( b/d ) of crude and 4 million b/d of refined products usually pass through it. About a third of the crude could be routed through pipelines in the Saudi and UAE that bypass the sea, leaving the rest with no disaster leave. As of March 3, according to the bank JPMorganChase, Iraq and Kuwait had roughly three and fourteen days, respectively, before they exceeded storage restrictions and stopped exporting crude via Hormuz, which amounts to nearly 5 million b/d, or 5 % of global production. Iraq has now cut production by 1.5 million b/d.
Gulf producers have not yet declared force majeure for scheduled supplies. However, traders anticipate some could and quickly. A measure of the prime Curtis signals over crude traded in Dubai, which reflects the cost of hedging Mediterranean crude income into Asia, has rocketed. This indicates that Asiatic buyers are looking to West Africa, Brazil, Guyana, Norway, and America to fill the void left by the Gulf. Some are already frantically looking for cargoes: on March 2, Brazilian barrels were offered for May delivery to China at a$ US10 premium to Brent, up from$ US3.40 on February 27.
Eastern consumers will be the first to feel the pain. China, Japan, and South Korea rely heavily on Middle Eastern goods, despite having enough petrol to survive a few months. A second of China’s complete need is made up of Gulf crude. Investing in the most famous Chinese pure future was halted on March 2 after they tripped the 9 per share daily-increase control.
Asia’s search for solutions may cause prices to go up for everyone else. According to Warren Patterson of ING, a bank, the industry is beginning to accept the notion that it may need to go through more than a week or two of disruption to support Brent’s$ US100 per barrel. Decades of disruption could force costs past$ US120, past reached in 2022. Yet pulling every lever may result in only 1 million to 2 million b/d and take at least six months to arrive. However, a new supply from elsewhere might be opened. A fifth of its diesel travels through Hormuz, which means that Europe, which purchases much Gulf crude, is not protected. Diesel” break” spreads – the profits producers earn when turning pure into finished energy – have exploded in recent days.
A halt to oil supplies from the Gulf does strike even harder and sooner. In 2025, more than 80 million tons of LNG, largely from Qatar, passed through Hormuz. The Ras Laffan complex, which closed on March 2, produced 75 million tonnes annually, or 17 % of global exports. Almost 30 vessels according to fill it in March are now circling the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean, another eight, now riddled, are idling on the wrong side of the strait. Since March 1, no crosses have been made. Ras Laffan, which is run by QatarEnergy, has issued force majeure finds to some long-term customers. Some details have emerged on the extent of damage at the flower, raising the possibility of a profound closure.
Gas is worrying Eastern customers, just like pure is. Qatar provided 30 % of China’s LNG imports last year, 45 % of India’s, and 99 % of Pakistan’s. Japan and South Korea also purchase significant amounts. The measure of the revenue earned from launching oil on America’s Gulf of Mexico beach and sending it to Asia rather than Europe or elsewhere next fortnight has surged to its highest since December 2022, according to Spark Commodities, a data firm.
A 60 percent increase in the previous day’s price was applied to an Asian cargo that arrived on March 2. Never have LNG freight costs from the Atlantic increased so quickly in one day. Asian gas prices have now spiked so far above European ones that it would theoretically make sense to load tankers with LNG stored in Europe and ship it east, says Natasha Fielding of Argus Media.
Because both are beginning to compete for the same spot cargoes, European prices will soon have to catch up with those of Asia. With winter not yet here, its gas storage is at its lowest level and 10 % lower than it was a year ago. Every week Hormuz stays closed, global supply shrinks by 1.5 million tonnes, reckons Wood Mackenzie, a consultancy. Markets could remain tight for a while as Asia and Europe drain storage more quickly and restock more aggressively over the northern summer. If Qatari exports don’t resume by the weekend, then Anne-Sophie Corbeau of Columbia University anticipates panic to start pouring in. Prices could soar beyond €100 per MWh.
The energy shock’s economic effects will be significant. The IMF uses a general rule of thumb to determine how much the price of a barrel of oil increases the world’s GDP annually by about 0.15 percentage points and raises inflation by 0.4 percentage points the year afterward. In other words, if prices head up to$ US100 a barrel this would subtract some 0.4 points from GDP growth and raise inflation by 1.2 points – a significant stagflationary shock.
Big energy importers will, by nature, suffer the most, and poor ones particularly. In less wealthy areas, energy costs typically account for a larger portion of spending. India spends about 3 per cent of GDP on foreign oil a year ( and has barely 20-25 days of usable stocks ), Thailand splurges nearly 5 per cent. However, in both cases, higher consumer prices and wider fiscal deficits will result from governments forcing state-owned oil refineries to operate at a loss or providing subsidies to consumers. As long as it is brief and currencies, which could plunge as investors rush for safe have ns, do not force their hand, Asia’s low inflation gives central banks more room to ignore a period of expensive energy.
Europe is not so lucky. According to the European Central Bank, a 10 % increase in oil prices causes inflation to rise by 0.4 % directly and almost immediately, plus another 0.2 % indirectly over the course of three years as businesses pass higher costs on to consumers. Additionally, according to the bank, about a tenth of the rise in natural gas prices is attributed to inflation in a year. Traders have pared back bets on the central bank cutting interest rates. Higher energy costs will affect power prices and reduce margins in industries. Alternatives will become more difficult as oil and gas prices rise, potentially boosting coal demand and causing consumers to cut back.
In either case, the overall economic impact is likely to be muted. Only a small portion of the consumption basket is made up of energy. And since America produces lots of oil and gas, a price shock pushes up output rather than cutting it, as it does in countries which are net importers.
In the midterm elections, Trump and his Republican Party may experience political connotations. Voters are already furious about the rising cost of living. Higher energy prices may boost economic aggregates, but they also redistribute income from America’s large number of energy consumers to its much smaller number of energy producers. Additionally, they might make Fed rates cut more difficult. Bets on the central bank cutting rates at least twice this year have fallen.
All this might explain Trump’s desire to soothe energy markets with naval escorts and insurance plans. According to him,” No matter what,” he said on social media, America” will ensure the FREE FLOW of ENERGY to the WORLD.” He is in opposition to a force that wants to hurt America.
©2026 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
Read more about the US-Israel-Iran conflict.
The Business Briefing newsletter delivers major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion. Sign up for it every morning of the week.
